Real
Self-Sufficiency Standards
Under
the Workforce Investment Act, self-sufficiency standards play
a critical role in determining the eligibility of working
adults for training services. Specifically, adults and dislocated
workers earning below the self-sufficiency standard are eligible
for intensive services and training using local WIA funds.
Thus the higher the standard, the more people - including
union members - will be eligible for services. If an area
fails to set their own self-sufficiency standard, the Department
of Labor prescribes a lower standard that leaves many working
families ineligible for training.
Labor's
goal - in general as well as in workforce development - is
to raise the living standards of working families and to ensure
that the system provides training opportunities to everyone
who needs them. Adopting a self-sufficiency standard that
truly represents a family-sustaining wage is a key part of
those goals. This is why it is important that labor representatives
urge the adoption of local standards that are based on family
composition, and local costs associated with working, including
transportation, childcare and taxes. As with community audits,
advocating for self-sufficiency standards presents a great
opportunity for labor to build coalitions with other WIB members
and community groups. By defining good jobs and good career
paths, self-sufficiency standards can help set thresholds
for what constitutes responsible public investment, as well
as serve as the basis for demonstrating the need to raise
wages in bargaining and organizing drives or living wage campaigns.
Subsidy
Accountability
Subsidy
disclosure laws and “clawbacks” in economic development
contracts require re-payment of public monies if employers
do not live up to their promised level of job creation. Virtually
unknown ten years ago, these laws have become a regular part
of the practice in public economic development. These same
techniques can also be used in workforce development to enforce
standards on job quality and to let taxpayers know where their
money is going. Specifically, when entering into a contract
with an employer for on-the-job training (OJT) or customized
training, the WIB board could use a legally binding instrument
to commit the employer to both the number and quality of jobs
to be created. The workforce board could also set guidelines
to recapture or “clawback” funds if those commitments
are not met.
For more
information, visit our website at www.workingforamerica.org